[Hot Topic] Dispatch revisits past lawsuit doubts over Son Seong Yeon, questioning if the 'FIFTY FIFTY' producer is a habitual offender!
Recently, the FIFTY FIFTY incident has been making huge noise. Producer Ahn Seong-il is accused of using the same tactic to exploit Son Sung-wan. Korean media Dispatch has even dug out a fake disposition judgement made for Son Sung-wan in 2017. Many netizens also point out that Ahn Seong-il is a habitual offender.

In February 2017, the Seoul Central District Court rejected all applications for the case, with the litigation costs borne by Son Seung-yeon. It is known that Son Seung-yeon signed an exclusive contract with Fortune company in 2012, and terminated the contract four years later through email notification.

At the time, the reasons Son Seong Yeon demanded for contract termination were, ① The previous agency Fortune failed to produce a new album, ② Son Seong Yeon didn't profit from Fortune, ③ Fortune was not supportive or obstructed her entertainment activities, ④ Fortune did not fulfill its liquidation obligations, ⑤ Fortune refused or hindered her participation in musical supports, and ⑥ Fortune forced Son Seong Yeon to publicly disclose her home environment, etc.

The court pointed out that even though the agency did not produce one new album every year, it had produced more than three singles on average annually. Therefore, it is hard to view this as a breach of contract. The other reasons were also considered by the court to be unreasonable and were dismissed, hence the case request was not accepted and was rejected.
Caridee小編
駐韓小編跟你說說韓國大小事~
comments (0)
Related Posts
K-Pop華納音樂首度回應FIFTY FIFTY事件!曾提議用「200億買斷」尹專務坦言不考慮合作!
近日圍繞女團FIFTY FIFTY的爭議不斷,負責FIFTY FIFTY海外流通的華納音樂仍回應了相關問題。 當初,全代表對製作人安聖日提出「Label Deal」的提案,在不出售公司的前提下,以預付款投資的方式取得資金,這也可以通過兩人4月22日互發的短信中確認。 之後,全代表在5月8日一起會見了華納音樂代表陳某和尹專務也沒有談論「Label Deal」,但是5月9日給全代表打電話的尹專務則提到了「用200億買斷」。 尹專務18日亦接受韓媒《文化日報》訪問表示:「應該先向全代表進行準確的確認。全代表回答說『不會說那樣的話』並拒絕了交易和買斷。」 據悉,華納音樂對FIFTY FIFTY感興趣,所以在「Label Deal」提案失敗後,提議向ATTRAKT投資預付款。尹專務說:「我們也在談論預付金,正在協調合同,安製作人主張直接行銷困難,並建議『走別的路』。」 對於此次事件,華納音樂保持沉默,也有人懷疑「華納音樂似乎想搶FIFTY FIFTY」,若FIFTY FIFTY提出的假處分申請成功,會不會與華納音樂或The Givers合作。 然而尹專務卻劃清界線說:「還沒有考慮過這一點。現在FIFTY FIFTY也通過華納音樂在海外流通,不是通過The Givers,而是通過ATTRAKT進行」,與安製作人保持距離。有歌謠界人士亦指:「華納音樂如果日後直接與FIFTY FIFTY合作的話,將會受到巨大的指責和難以挽回的道德打擊。」 小編:業界也跟她們劃清界線了⋯⋯🧐
K-Pop



