K-PopK-DramaK-BeautyRankingsK-Influencers
Login

Global K-Culture Media & Community. Your gateway to K-Pop, K-Beauty, K-Drama, and Korean entertainment. Real-time rankings, news, and community.

Company

  • About Kagit
  • K-Influencers
  • For Brands
  • For Creators

Navigation

  • Home
  • K-Pop
  • K-Drama
  • K-Beauty
  • K-Food
  • K-Travel
  • K-Style
  • K-Biz
  • K-Medi

Rankings

  • All Rankings
  • K-Pop Buzz Chart
  • K-Beauty Ranking
  • K-Drama Chart
  • K-Food Trends
  • K-Style Chart
  • K-Influencer Index

Community

  • Login
  • Bookmarks
  • Settings

Contact

admin@kagit.kr
ServicesKagitkagit.krwishnotewishnote.krComing soonwishnote.twwishnote.tw→ merging into kagit.kr TC

© 2026 Kagit. All rights reserved.

TermsPrivacy
HomeDiscoverRankingsEventsMe
HomeK-PopDispatch exposes new update in FIFTY FIFTY controversy: Producer suspected of impersonating CEO and composer based on transcribed audio.
K-Pop

Dispatch exposes new update in FIFTY FIFTY controversy: Producer suspected of impersonating CEO and composer based on transcribed audio.

Caridee小編7/6/2023 1 min read

Today, Korean media Dispatch has once again released recorded audio regarding the FIFTY FIFTY girl group controversy. In their report, Dispatch strongly criticises The Givers' representative, Ahn Sung Il, accusing him of fraudulently impersonating the CEO of ATTRAKT, the management company for FIFTY FIFTY.

According to the contents revealed by Dispatch, Ahn stated, "ATTRAKT paid $9,000 (12 million Korean won) for the rights of the record producer's connectivity, which is the right of the record producer, while the copyright belongs to the creator of the work."

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

However, Dispatch sarcastically commented, "He spoke quite smoothly for a long time, but is there a hidden meaning behind his words?" In response, Dispatch reached out to the Music Copyright Association for clarification. It was confirmed that the connection rights of "Cupid" belong to ATTRAKT, but The Givers, the production company, have officially signed a rights transfer contract with the author, paid the necessary fees, and obtained the rights.

Image source_Dispatch
Image source_Dispatch

Although Representative Ahn admitted to the copyright transfer after the fact, he insisted that it was not purchased with ATTRAKT's money. However, Dispatch emphasized that the source of the money is not the main concern. They raised a counter question, stating that if the entire promotion of FIFTY FIFTY was handed over to Representative Ahn, it implies that The Givers are working for ATTRAKT.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Caridee小編

Caridee小編

駐韓小編跟你說說韓國大小事~

comments (0)

0

Related Posts

The Korean Entertainment Producers' Association spoke out for the first time about the "Fifty Fifty" incident! Publicly supporting the agencies: "We will not turn a blind eye to this!"K-Pop

The Korean Entertainment Producers' Association spoke out for the first time about the "Fifty Fifty" incident! Publicly supporting the agencies: "We will not turn a blind eye to this!"

Today, the Korean Entertainment Producers Association expressed their stance on the issue involving the girl group "Fifty Fifty" and supported the position of their associated company, Attract. The Korean Entertainment Producers Association stated, "Even in a difficult environment, our association and member companies have noticed and witnessed the miracle that ATTRAKT (CEO: Chon Hong Jun) created the group Fifty Fifty in just a few months, and are aware of the challenges the company is currently facing." The Korean Performing Arts Producers Association wrote: "Time and again, practices such as frequent changing of group members and early contact with artists, disrupt the normal business activities, leading to irreversible consequences for the companies and their artists." "Capital-backed illegitimate powers have been snatching talent, damaging the roots of K-pop as well as the foundation for the growth of producers and artists. The relationship between producers and artists is no longer a simple 'A' and 'B' relation, they are all partners striving for the same dream. Our association will never turn a blind eye to this, and we will respond strongly." At the same time, the Korean Entertainment Producers Association emphasized the necessity of improving the system: "We are deeply concerned about the relevant legal and institutional issues that have not yet been considered in the industry," and said, "We feel the necessity of improving the system to prevent such situations from happening again in the Korean entertainment industry. We call on the parliament, government, and relevant institutions to work together to find solutions." In addition, the Korean Performing Arts Producers Association stated: "We are seeking the establishment of the 'Popular Music Industry Promotion Committee', the introduction of a free contract system for artists, rental systems for artists and other solutions for the healthy development of the industry, so that 'K-culture' is not only our own, but can also lead the global cultural industry." Lastly, the association stated: "We look forward to overcoming the challenging industry environment, just like ATTRAKT, who grew from the depths of poverty, to meet their expectations." Following is the full statement of the Korean Entertainment Producers Association: "The current KPOP is in the center of global culture, receiving passionate love from fans around the world. However, we have noticed some problems troubling artists and production companies. Therefore, we, as the Korean Entertainment Producers Association, are addressing our concerns for some recent issues and publicly stating our position." "Firstly, regarding the current contract dispute between ATTRAKT and Fifty Fifty, we believe this to be a serious issue. If one party violates the contract, resulting in the work of the artists being affected, then we must deal with this matter immediately. No matter what the contract content, the most important point is: both parties must respect and abide by the agreed terms." "Furthermore, we are concerned about The Givers company's actions. If the company removes related documents or carries out right purchases without permission, then there is indeed an issue with such behavior. We hope for a thorough investigation to be conducted on this situation.However, we also believe that the entertainment industry is not solely about business activities, it's closely related to every artist's life and career. Therefore, we urge all stakeholders, not to sacrifice artists' welfare for business gains. Artists' health and happiness should be our primary consideration." "Finally, the Korean Entertainment Producers' Association will continue to strive to create a fair and just environment for our artists and production companies. We believe, only in this kind of environment, can KPOP continue to thrive and shine. We hope that all parties involved understand and respect our stance. We look forward to resolving all disputes as soon as possible so that our artists can return to their normal work and life."

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

In addition, Dispatch highlighted the copyright distribution of "Cupid" with 28.65% for Ahn Sung-il, 66.85% for The Givers, 4% for Baek, and 0.5% for Song Ji-kyung (Kina). Furthermore, Dispatch criticised Ahn's deceptive recording, stating that the three-month period mentioned by Ahn has already elapsed, questioning why he misled the representative about the timeframe. Dispatch described Ahn's behaviour as close to fraudulent.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

Finally, Dispatch raised the question, "Even if money was paid to purchase the copyright from the composer, can one claim to be the composer?" A representative from a copyright association responded, "This is nearly unheard of." A well-known idol songwriter criticised the situation as an outrageous trick and even questioned its authenticity.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

In addition, representatives from the Korean Music Copyright Association and current composers emphasized, "Merely purchasing the rights from the original author does not entitle you to remove the composer's name. Paying for the rights does not make you the composer. Typically, the composer's name should be written directly under the 'author's name', while the name of the copyright owner should be written under the 'rights name'. That is the correct approach."

Image Source_YouTube | Dispatch
Image Source_YouTube | Dispatch

Upon hearing the news, netizens expressed overwhelming support for Representative Jeon: "We hope Representative Jeon wins the lawsuit! The whole of South Korea is cheering for you!" "Thank goodness there was an automatic recording to support Representative Jeonㅠㅠ We stand by you and support you!" "It's truly unfortunate that Representative Jeon had to go through thisㅠㅠ We're here to support you!"

YouTube
Lemonade3 years ago
Members know FIFTY FIFTY's CEO sold his car! Netizens blasted them for their reaction after the sale: do they still have humanity?K-Pop

Members know FIFTY FIFTY's CEO sold his car! Netizens blasted them for their reaction after the sale: do they still have humanity?

The entire members of the girl group FIFTY FIFTY (Keena, Saena, Sio, Aran) have filed a breach of exclusive contract lawsuit against their current management company ATTRAKT. However, their past remarks have once again attracted attention, even sparking a "humanity controversy". The four members of FIFTY FIFTY appeared on the SBS POWER FM program "Cultwo Show" in April. On that day, the host Kim Tae-jun asked the members, "You have been debuted for six months now, how do you feel upon hearing the news of topping the Billboard?" Member's response: "Actually, when we first entered the Billboard Hot 100, we were told by Sang-Il, the representative of The Givers who was on a business trip in America. That was the first time we knew." Afterwards, the host Kim Tae-jun also asked the members: "I heard that CEO Jeon Hong-jun sold his car to let you guys debut," the members seemed somewhat surprised. One of them said, "Ah! This proves that you care about us a lot, this is something we didn't even know." In response to the members' panicked reaction, Kim Tae-gyun retorted, "Why don't you know that Representative Jeon Hong-jun sold his car to get a better song?" Hearing these words, the members replied, "Ah, maybe it was when he was changing cars." "Afterwards on other shows, members of FIFTY FIFTY even referred to The Givers' producer, An Sung-il, as a 'representative.' Upon seeing the clip, many netizens also criticized the members of FIFTY FIFTY, accusing them of lacking humanity." Netizens have continuously expressed: "Even if they didn't know, as a person, if they heard that someone was selling their car and watches for them, they should at least pretend to be touched", "They don't seem to value their representative at all", "They have been brainwashed by the production team", "It's unclear why they wanted to transfer and sue their original representative", "The production team sure has ulterior motives", "I feel distressed after hearing their words! Do they still have human decency?!", "Even if they didn't know, when they heard about it, they should've said 'Thank you, representative' or something like that on air", etc. Editor: Saying like this is indeed a bit too much!🧐  Related articles: Company D's huge exposure to the FIFTY FIFTY incident exclusive internal information! A heartfelt admission from the 60-year-old representative: I was wrong to trust too much! FIFTY FIFTY's agency publicly releases powerful phone recordings! Warner suspected of teaming up with the production company to snatch members with 20 billion! 【Hot discussion in Korean entertainment】FIFTY FIFTY's contract dispute exposed! The agency condemns external forces and reveals reasons for inactivity!

Caridee小編3 years ago
"FIFTY FIFTY falls off the pedestal! Most collaborations cancelled, netizens mock 'you reap what you sow'!"K-Pop

"FIFTY FIFTY falls off the pedestal! Most collaborations cancelled, netizens mock 'you reap what you sow'!"

After a dispute with their agency, girl group FIFTY FIFTY has been inundated with negative reviews, and it was reported on the 4th that they have missed many performance opportunities. According to a report by South Korean media on the 4th, information revealed by industry insiders indicated that FIFTY FIFTY had been awarded the opportunity to sing one of the original soundtracks (OST) for the movie "Barbie". However, plans to film a music video for the song fell through following controversy. FIFTY FIFTY, as the so-called miracle of small and medium-sized companies, has first emerged in the United States and has also received many job negotiations in South Korea. In addition to the MV of "Barbie", they were originally expected to shoot commercials with famous athletes, shoot ads for international companies, and appear on famous variety shows, but now everything has turned into a bubble. The dispute between FIFTY FIFTY and their management company began on the 23rd of last month. The agency's representative pointed out that external forces are trying to poach the members and sent a registered letter to Warner Music Korea. Warner Music Korea subsequently denied these allegations and stated that it would take legal actions against false statements. Subsequently, there were also reports of the members suing the management company and filing for a provisional disposition to terminate the contract. This move drew widespread criticism from netizens. "FIFTY FIFTY went viral globally as their single 'CUPID' climbed up the U.S. Billboard charts. This time, their failure is described by netizens as a goose who thought it laid a golden egg, but disemboweled itself before it could even hatch." After the news of the collaboration cancellation was released, netizens also sighed one after another, "Even we, who are unrelated, feel a pity. How heartbreaking it must be for the representative", "What should the representative do QQ", "Alas ... this one will regret for a lifetime", "The boss is the most pitiful, the members got what they deserved." Editor: The boss must really be worn out...

吳喬巴3 years ago

Trending now

  1. 1

    Actress Ha Young Apologizes After Boasting 'Four-Generation Doctor Family' Sparks Pro-Japanese Controversy

  2. 2

    Convicted Sex Offender Go Young-wook Attacks Park Ha-sun, Ryu Soo-young, and Kim Ji-hyun on Social Media

  3. 3

    Former CNBLUE Member Lee Jong-hyun Resurfaces After 8 Years, Shares New Life Away From Spotlight

  4. 4

    OH MY GIRL's Mimi Criticized for 'Childish' Speech on 'Earth Arcade,' Sparks Online Debate

  5. 5

    ENHYPEN's NI-KI Performs Amid Fan's Death; Mother Travels to Korea

Image Source_YouTube | Dispatch

Cheer the stars of this story

  • FI
    FIFTY FIFTY

    Cheer Level 0

    0
    Your Cheers

Log in to start collecting cheers on this article:

  • Read +5
  • Early reader +5 · 20 spots left
  • Comment +10
  • First comment +20
Log in for the early-reader bonus — 20 spots left