K-Beauty Ranking on 2026-09-10

This is the top 20 of the K-Beauty Ranking exactly as it stood on 2026-09-10 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 150 validated days are public, from 2026-03-10 to 2026-09-17.

Kagit K-Beauty Influence Index on 2026-09-10
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1Torriden3/3 axes measured605
2Round Lab3/3 axes measured554
3Beauty of Joseon3/3 axes measured523
4Beplain3/3 axes measured522
5AesturaRising2.23/3 axes measured513
6PulliNew3/3 axes measured432
7SKINFOOD PadsNew3/3 axes measured42New2
8HERA3/3 axes measured42▲12
9LaneigeRising2.23/3 axes measured41New2
10Dr.GRising2.23/3 axes measured41▼32
11Wellage3/3 axes measured39▲282
12Ma:nyo3/3 axes measured382
13ILSO3/3 axes measured362
14About Tone3/3 axes measured36▲312
15eSpoir3/3 axes measured36▼12
16ROSEKIMRising2.53/3 axes measured33▲392
17Innisfree3/3 axes measured32▲412
18Cell Fusion C3/3 axes measured29▲472
Held outside the ranking for insufficient data (2)

Too few measured axes and sources, so it is held outside the ranking

  • Anua2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • What's Skin2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data

How the score is computed

Multi-source influence scoring across beauty platforms, communities, and global reach. Platform Ranking (30%) + Community Buzz (20%) + Global Reach (20%) + Review Quality (20%) + Consensus (10%). Ingredient trend bonuses applied for mega/rising ingredients.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-09-10 · Out of 100 · 3 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v1.1

Sources: GlowPick (글로우픽), Hwahae (화해), Musinsa Beauty (무신사 뷰티), OliveYoung (올리브영), YouTube Beauty

  • Platform Ranking (50%) — Beauty platform rankings (Hwahae, OliveYoung, GlowPick)
  • Review Quality (33%) — Review depth, rating consistency, repurchase signals
  • Consensus (17%) — Cross-source validation

Full methodology

Scoring details

Low agreement with the independent aggregate of the per-source rankings (tau=0.17).

Axes excluded from this run (2)
  • Global Reach
  • Community Buzz

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-beauty/history