Rankings/K-Beauty Ranking/2026-09-15

K-Beauty Ranking on 2026-09-15

This is the top 20 of the K-Beauty Ranking exactly as it stood on 2026-09-15 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 150 validated days are public, from 2026-03-10 to 2026-09-17.

Kagit K-Beauty Influence Index on 2026-09-15
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1Torriden3/3 axes measured60—4
2Anua3/3 axes measured59—2
3Round Lab3/3 axes measured55—3
4Beauty of Joseon3/3 axes measured51—3
5Aestura3/3 axes measured47▲22
6HERA3/3 axes measured45▲42
7freshian3/3 axes measured43▲42
8Jung Saem Mool3/3 axes measured43▲12
9rom&nd3/3 axes measured43▲292
10COSRX3/3 axes measured42▲62
11Mediheal3/3 axes measured41▲42
12Innisfree3/3 axes measured37▲62
13Etude3/3 axes measured37New2
14Isntree3/3 axes measured26▲72
Held outside the ranking for insufficient data (6)

Too few measured axes and sources, so it is held outside the ranking

  • Illiyoon2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • Abib2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • Wellage2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • Numbuzin2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • SKIN10042/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • BioHeal Boh2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data

How the score is computed

Multi-source influence scoring across beauty platforms, communities, and global reach. Platform Ranking (30%) + Community Buzz (20%) + Global Reach (20%) + Review Quality (20%) + Consensus (10%). Ingredient trend bonuses applied for mega/rising ingredients.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-09-15 · Out of 100 · 3 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v1.1

Sources: Hwahae (화해), Musinsa Beauty (무신사 뷰티), OliveYoung (올리브영), YouTube Beauty

  • Platform Ranking (50%) — Beauty platform rankings (Hwahae, OliveYoung, GlowPick)
  • Review Quality (33%) — Review depth, rating consistency, repurchase signals
  • Consensus (17%) — Cross-source validation

Full methodology →

Axes excluded from this run (2)
  • Global Reach
  • Community Buzz

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-beauty/history