K-Beauty Ranking on 2026-09-17

This is the top 20 of the K-Beauty Ranking exactly as it stood on 2026-09-17 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 150 validated days are public, from 2026-03-10 to 2026-09-17.

Kagit K-Beauty Influence Index on 2026-09-17
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1Torriden3/3 axes measured604
2Illiyoon3/3 axes measured59▲163
3Round Lab3/3 axes measured57▼14
4WellageRising2.23/3 axes measured53▼12
5Beplain3/3 axes measured512
6Aestura3/3 axes measured503
7Beauty of Joseon3/3 axes measured49▼33
8d'Alba3/3 axes measured47▲172
9Mediheal3/3 axes measured452
10COSRX3/3 axes measured43▲13
11Holika Holika3/3 axes measured43▲202
12freshian3/3 axes measured42▲12
132aN3/3 axes measured41▲272
14Peripera3/3 axes measured40▲312
15LAGOM3/3 axes measured40New2
16AHC3/3 axes measured30▲472
Held outside the ranking for insufficient data (4)

Too few measured axes and sources, so it is held outside the ranking

  • Atopalm2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • Anua2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • What's Skin2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data
  • SKIN10042/3 axes measuredInsufficient data

How the score is computed

Multi-source influence scoring across beauty platforms, communities, and global reach. Platform Ranking (30%) + Community Buzz (20%) + Global Reach (20%) + Review Quality (20%) + Consensus (10%). Ingredient trend bonuses applied for mega/rising ingredients.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-09-17 · Out of 100 · 3 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v1.1

Sources: Hwahae (화해), Musinsa Beauty (무신사 뷰티), OliveYoung (올리브영), YouTube Beauty

  • Platform Ranking (50%) — Beauty platform rankings (Hwahae, OliveYoung, GlowPick)
  • Review Quality (33%) — Review depth, rating consistency, repurchase signals
  • Consensus (17%) — Cross-source validation

Full methodology

Scoring details

Low agreement with the independent aggregate of the per-source rankings (tau=0.24).

Axes excluded from this run (2)
  • Global Reach
  • Community Buzz

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-beauty/history