K-Beauty Ranking on 2026-10-22

This is the top 20 of the K-Beauty Ranking exactly as it stood on 2026-10-22 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 183 validated days are public, from 2026-03-10 to 2026-10-23.

Kagit K-Beauty Influence Index on 2026-10-22
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1Round Lab3/3 axes measured62▲13
2Torriden3/3 axes measured62▼15
3Aestura3/3 axes measured59—3
4COSRX3/3 axes measured58—3
5Beplain3/3 axes measured57—3
6HERA3/3 axes measured54▲192
7Beauty of Joseon3/3 axes measured54▼13
8Jung Saem Mool3/3 axes measured53▲232
9Wellage3/3 axes measured50▼12
10Abib3/3 axes measured50▲172
11Dr.Althea3/3 axes measured50▲292
12Mediheal3/3 axes measured48—2
13freshian3/3 axes measured47▲402
14LaneigeRising2.53/3 axes measured45—2
15Etude3/3 axes measured45▲452
16Ma:nyo3/3 axes measured44▼12
17Banila Co3/3 axes measured43▲12
18hince3/3 axes measured42New2
19Innisfree3/3 axes measured41▼32
Held outside the ranking for insufficient data (1)

Too few measured axes and sources, so it is held outside the ranking

  • Anua2/3 axes measuredInsufficient data

How the score is computed

Multi-source influence scoring across beauty platforms, communities, and global reach. Platform Ranking (30%) + Community Buzz (20%) + Global Reach (20%) + Review Quality (20%) + Consensus (10%). Ingredient trend bonuses applied for mega/rising ingredients.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-10-22 · Out of 100 · 3 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v1.1

Sources: GlowPick (글로우픽), Hwahae (화해), Musinsa Beauty (무신사 뷰티), OliveYoung (올리브영), YouTube Beauty

  • Platform Ranking (50%) — Beauty platform rankings (Hwahae, OliveYoung, GlowPick)
  • Review Quality (33%) — Review depth, rating consistency, repurchase signals
  • Consensus (17%) — Cross-source validation

Full methodology →

Scoring details

Low agreement with the independent aggregate of the per-source rankings (tau=0.29).

Axes excluded from this run (2)
  • Global Reach
  • Community Buzz

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-beauty/history