K-Pop Buzz Chart on 2026-09-11

This is the top 20 of the K-Pop Buzz Chart exactly as it stood on 2026-09-11 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 162 validated days are public, from 2026-03-09 to 2026-10-22.

Kagit K-Pop Influence Index on 2026-09-11
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1aespaNew4/4 axes measured69▲18
2BIGBANGNew4/4 axes measured69▼16
3BLACKPINKNew4/4 axes measured68—8
4NCTNew4/4 axes measured67▲492
5JENNIENew4/4 axes measured66▲26
6NewJeansNew4/4 axes measured64▲68
7IVENew4/4 axes measured64▼27
8KiiiKiiiNew4/4 axes measured63▲85
9CORTISNew4/4 axes measured63—5
10IUNew4/4 axes measured62▲205
11SNew4/4 axes measured62—3
12Girls' GenerationNew4/4 axes measured62▼24
13BilllieNew4/4 axes measured62▲12
14Choi Ji-suNew4/4 axes measured62▲262
15Haru TabloNew4/4 axes measured62▲84
16NMIXXNew4/4 axes measured61▼17
17ReiNew4/4 axes measured61▼94
18BTSNew4/4 axes measured60▼56
19UPNew4/4 axes measured60▲123
20J.Y. ParkNew4/4 axes measured60▲22

How the score is computed

Multi-dimensional influence scoring: Domestic Buzz (30%) + Global Reach (30%) + Chart Power (10%) + Engagement Quality (15%) + Cross-Source Consensus (15%). Each source weighted by authority, engagement quality, and audience uniqueness. All values log-normalized to 0-100.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-09-11 · Out of 100 · 4 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v3.1

Sources: Bugs, Circle Chart, Google Trends, Melon, NatePann, Spotify, TheQoo, Wikipedia, YouTube

  • Domestic Buzz (43%) — Korean community discourse volume (TheQoo, NatePann)
  • Consensus (22%) — Cross-source validation: more independent sources = more credible
  • Engagement (21%) — Comment-to-view ratio, discussion depth across sources
  • Chart Power (14%) — Streaming chart presence (Melon, Bugs). Low weight: manipulation risk

Full methodology →

Scoring details

Low agreement with the independent aggregate of the per-source rankings (tau=0.29).

Axes excluded from this run (1)
  • Global Reach

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-pop/history