K-Pop Buzz Chart on 2026-10-10

This is the top 20 of the K-Pop Buzz Chart exactly as it stood on 2026-10-10 (UTC). Scores run 0–100 and are a weighted aggregate of that day's collected signals; a published snapshot is never rewritten.

A snapshot is kept for every day this ranking runs. 151 validated days are public, from 2026-03-09 to 2026-10-10.

Kagit K-Pop Influence Index on 2026-10-10
RankEntryInfluence scoreChangeSources
1KATSEYE4/5 axes measured69—2
2NMIXX5/5 axes measured66▲15
3WOODZ4/5 axes measured66▼13
4Hearts2Hearts5/5 axes measured65▲15
5BLACKPINK5/5 axes measured65▼17
6BTS5/5 axes measured63—4
7KiiiKiii5/5 axes measured63▲14
8IU4/5 axes measured63▼13
9ILLIT5/5 axes measured63—7
10IVERising2.35/5 axes measured61▲26
11Jung Kook5/5 axes measured61▼14
12Roy Kim4/5 axes measured61▼13
13aespa5/5 axes measured61—7
14Sung Si-kyung4/5 axes measured61—2
15Girls' Generation4/5 axes measured61—3
16RIIZE4/5 axes measured60—2
17LE SSERAFIMRising2.34/5 axes measured60—4
18BIGBANG5/5 axes measured59—4
19CORTISRising2.34/5 axes measured59▲53
20BABYMONSTER4/5 axes measured59▼13

How the score is computed

Multi-dimensional influence scoring: Domestic Buzz (30%) + Global Reach (30%) + Chart Power (10%) + Engagement Quality (15%) + Cross-Source Consensus (15%). Each source weighted by authority, engagement quality, and audience uniqueness. All values log-normalized to 0-100.

Daily aggregate · as of 2026-10-10 · Out of 100 · 5 axes measured of 5 designed

Weights are renormalised over the axes actually measured, then pulled toward the category average in proportion to how much was measured. · scoring v3.1

Sources: Bugs, Google Trends, Melon, NatePann, Spotify, TheQoo, Wikipedia, YouTube

  • Domestic Buzz (30%) — Korean community discourse volume (TheQoo, NatePann)
  • Global Reach (30%) — International visibility (Reddit, YouTube, Spotify, Wikipedia)
  • Consensus (15%) — Cross-source validation: more independent sources = more credible
  • Engagement (15%) — Comment-to-view ratio, discussion depth across sources
  • Chart Power (10%) — Streaming chart presence (Melon, Bugs). Low weight: manipulation risk

Full methodology →

Scoring details

Low agreement with the independent aggregate of the per-source rankings (tau=0.29).

Machine-readable data for this period: /api/rankings/k-pop/history