FIFTY FIFTY海外粉反應惹韓國網友吐糟!網狠批:比想象中更無知!

Caridee小編 1 min read

This article isn't available in English yet, so it's shown in its original language (繁體中文).

近日,女團FIFTY FIFTY的4位成員正向現在的經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟,連日來也被爆出不同的證據,讓不少韓國網友也同情ATTRAKT的全代表,希望他可以好好加油。

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

然而,有韓國網友今日就翻出FIFTY FIFTY海外粉絲的反應,與韓國網友完全持相反的態度也引來網友們的熱議。

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

根據韓國網友在Twitter上的截圖可見,不少外國網友也在FIFTY FIFTY的官方帳號下留言:「釋放FIFTY FIFTY」、「會永遠等待FIFTY FIFTY!」、「去你的!ATTRAKT!」、「ATTRAKT你在做什麼?你搞砸了整個大計劃!」、「希望女孩們可以勝訴!」

Image source_온라인 커뮤니티
Image source_온라인 커뮤니티

外國網友與韓國網友完全不同的反應,也讓韓國網友感到非常衝擊:「外國人比想象中更無知」、「這種回應真的很討厭!外國粉絲為什麼這樣」、「看他們說不要罵T.O.P、勝利就知道」、

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

「所以說外國粉是蟑螂也是有理由的」、「刑事起訴結束後公開會計賬簿和資料就能知道誰是對的」、「在YouTube上外國人也都知道說要打起精神來,Twitter簡直無法相信」。

Image source_온라인 커뮤니티
Image source_온라인 커뮤니티

但也有網友指出:「外國粉絲不會捲入感性的爆料,而是客觀的。外國粉認為藝人應該清楚地清算,相反韓國卻有煽動地提到賣車賣錶,即使在清算不透明的情況下,奴隸合約也要忍受,所以這也是在韓國很多經紀公司欺騙藝人的原因。」

Image source_온라인 커뮤니티
Image source_온라인 커뮤니티

也有網友提到:「只是部份在Twitter的外國粉才這樣!也有跟韓國網友一樣的海外粉」,之前有海外網友亦指:「現在這個混亂的情況讓人以為她們出道很長時間、有很多熱門歌,但其實人們只懂一首熱門歌而不是成員,她們要完了。」

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty

小編:海外粉的反應跟韓國網友真的相差很遠!🧐

Caridee小編

Caridee小編

駐韓小編跟你說說韓國大小事~

Cheer the stars of this story

Log in to start collecting cheers on this article:

  • Read +5
  • Early reader +5 · 20 spots left
  • Comment +10
  • First comment +20
Log in for the early-reader bonus — 20 spots left

comments (0)

Related Posts

【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY今推《芭比》新曲!網批:連Cupid都不想聽!K-Pop

【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY今推《芭比》新曲!網批:連Cupid都不想聽!

近日,女團FIFTY FIFTY的4位成員正向現在的經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟,然而ATTRAKT今天卻為FIFTY FIFTY公開新曲。 今日上午,YouTube《FIFTY FIFTY Official》公開了《FIFTY FIFTY - Barbie Dreams(feat. Kalii)[From Barbie The Album] [Official Audio]》的短片,而該歌曲是為電影《芭比》主唱的OST新曲。 網友們紛紛表示:「經紀公司還一直為她們做下去,這更讓人心痛⋯⋯」、「雖然對經紀公司代表感到很抱歉,但也不太想聽她們的歌」、「連Cupid都不想聽!」、 「本來電影的形象做的很好,但這OST到底是什麼」、「站在代表的立場上,真的感到很可惜」、「維持組合的名字,再重新選成員吧」、 「經紀公司代表太可憐了,如果重組的話我會支持你」、「成員全部換掉吧。現在成員們的歌都不想聽」、「現在能這樣用英語唱也是因為經紀公司的支持,真是的⋯⋯」等。 5日,在首爾中央地方法院開始了FIFTY FIFTY向經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟。FIFTY FIFTY的律師表示:「該事件基於經紀公司的能力不足,經紀公司和製作公司的矛盾需要個別解決。」 對此,ATTRAKT的律師表示:「代表用了全部財產,還挪用了母親的資金。80億韓元不是小數目,ATTRAKT投資了這些資金還未指沒有能力是不是有點過分?成員們沒有錯誤。我們也想盡快達成協議,但是沒有接觸的機會,通過代理人也無法得到任何答覆。該事件的本質是藝人背後的勢力。」 小編:經紀公司在這個情況還幫FIFTY FIFTY宣傳新曲⋯⋯😢

Caridee小編3 years ago
繁體中文
Netizens reveal FIFTY FIFTY's dormitory is better than those of big companies, including New Jeans and GFRIEND! K-Pop

Netizens reveal FIFTY FIFTY's dormitory is better than those of big companies, including New Jeans and GFRIEND!

In the ongoing contract dispute involving the girl group FIFTY FIFTY, recent developments have garnered significant attention. A netizen recently shared a series of pictures comparing the past dormitories of various girl groups, including NewJeans, which belongs to a large-scale planning company, and GFRIEND, Lovelyz, and Secret, which are associated with small and medium-sized planning companies. These images have sparked interest among netizens. According to ATTRAKT, the management company responsible for handling FIFTY FIFTY, the group's representative, Jeon Hong Joon, has provided the members with a dormitory located in the Gangnam area. The dormitory consists of three rooms, two bathrooms, and has a monthly rent of 3.3 million won. Additionally, the company has also been covering tutoring fees for various subjects for the group members. The girl group GFRIEND, managed by SOURCE MUSIC, made their debut in 2015. The group consists of members Yerin, SinB, Yuju, Eunha, Sowon, and Umji. In an episode of their reality show titled "One Fine Day with GFRIEND," the members revealed their dormitory, which featured two bunk beds. This episode provided fans with a glimpse into the living arrangements of the six members, who had previously appeared on the show. Lovelyz, a girl group under Woollim Entertainment, made their debut in 2014. The group consists of members Ye In, Kei, Ji Ae, Su Jeong, Mi Joo, Ji Soo, Jin, and Baby Soul. In the 2015 broadcast of "Shin Dong Yup's Bachelor Party," Lovelyz revealed that all eight members shared a single room in their dormitory for sleeping purposes. This provided insight into their living arrangements at the time. The group Secret, consisting of members Hana, Sunhwa, Jieun, and Hyosung, made their debut in 2009. In the past variety show "Invincible Youth," the members revealed their semi-basement dormitory, which surprised many netizens. The disclosure of their living conditions generated a strong reaction among viewers, who expressed shock at the revelation. The up-and-coming girl group NewJeans, composed of members Minji, Haerin, Hanni, Danielle, and Hyein, made their debut last year under the management of HYBE. During their appearance on the tvN variety show "Yoo Quiz," the group members mentioned that they are currently residing in a dormitory with two rooms.  Following the revelation of past dormitories belonging to idols from small and medium-sized agencies, including a comparison with the dormitory of the popular girl group, NewJeans, managed by a large agency, netizens shared their thoughts. Comments such as "The idols I support also reside in 3-4 person rooms with bunk beds," and "Even major agencies don't provide such dormitories," were expressed. Some netizens referenced BTS's early days, mentioning that the group had only two rooms, with one allocated for the manager and the other for the members. In contrast, there were observations that FIFTY FIFTY's dormitory appeared to be more favourable compared to New Jeans'.

Caridee小編3 years ago
Dispatch exposes new update in FIFTY FIFTY controversy: Producer suspected of impersonating CEO and composer based on transcribed audio.K-Pop

Dispatch exposes new update in FIFTY FIFTY controversy: Producer suspected of impersonating CEO and composer based on transcribed audio.

Today, Korean media Dispatch has once again released recorded audio regarding the FIFTY FIFTY girl group controversy. In their report, Dispatch strongly criticises The Givers' representative, Ahn Sung Il, accusing him of fraudulently impersonating the CEO of ATTRAKT, the management company for FIFTY FIFTY. According to the contents revealed by Dispatch, Ahn stated, "ATTRAKT paid $9,000 (12 million Korean won) for the rights of the record producer's connectivity, which is the right of the record producer, while the copyright belongs to the creator of the work." However, Dispatch sarcastically commented, "He spoke quite smoothly for a long time, but is there a hidden meaning behind his words?" In response, Dispatch reached out to the Music Copyright Association for clarification. It was confirmed that the connection rights of "Cupid" belong to ATTRAKT, but The Givers, the production company, have officially signed a rights transfer contract with the author, paid the necessary fees, and obtained the rights. Although Representative Ahn admitted to the copyright transfer after the fact, he insisted that it was not purchased with ATTRAKT's money. However, Dispatch emphasized that the source of the money is not the main concern. They raised a counter question, stating that if the entire promotion of FIFTY FIFTY was handed over to Representative Ahn, it implies that The Givers are working for ATTRAKT. In addition, Dispatch highlighted the copyright distribution of "Cupid" with 28.65% for Ahn Sung-il, 66.85% for The Givers, 4% for Baek, and 0.5% for Song Ji-kyung (Kina). Furthermore, Dispatch criticised Ahn's deceptive recording, stating that the three-month period mentioned by Ahn has already elapsed, questioning why he misled the representative about the timeframe. Dispatch described Ahn's behaviour as close to fraudulent. Finally, Dispatch raised the question, "Even if money was paid to purchase the copyright from the composer, can one claim to be the composer?" A representative from a copyright association responded, "This is nearly unheard of." A well-known idol songwriter criticised the situation as an outrageous trick and even questioned its authenticity. In addition, representatives from the Korean Music Copyright Association and current composers emphasized, "Merely purchasing the rights from the original author does not entitle you to remove the composer's name. Paying for the rights does not make you the composer. Typically, the composer's name should be written directly under the 'author's name', while the name of the copyright owner should be written under the 'rights name'. That is the correct approach." Upon hearing the news, netizens expressed overwhelming support for Representative Jeon: "We hope Representative Jeon wins the lawsuit! The whole of South Korea is cheering for you!" "Thank goodness there was an automatic recording to support Representative Jeonㅠㅠ We stand by you and support you!" "It's truly unfortunate that Representative Jeon had to go through thisㅠㅠ We're here to support you!"

Caridee小編3 years ago

Trending now

  1. 1

    Baek Jin-hee's Past Relationships Resurface, Sparking 'Love Square' Speculation with Yoon Hyun-min, Park Seo-joon, and Jeon So-min

  2. 2

    Actress Park Ha-sun Flaunts Chanel-Clad US Vacation Amidst Controversial Remarks from Go Young-wook

  3. 3

    Han So-hee Reflects on Love, Self-Worth After Ryu Jun-yeol Split: "He Didn't Abandon Me"

  4. 4

    Park Wi Controversy Spreads to His Mother After Song Ji-eun’s Story About Old Clothes Resurfaces

  5. 5

    Girls' Generation's Kim Hyo-yeon Reveals Why She's Lived in Group Dorm for 19 Years