DiscoverRankingsInfluencersSaved
Login

Global K-Culture Media & Community. Your gateway to K-Pop, K-Beauty, K-Drama, and Korean entertainment. Real-time rankings, news, and community.

Company

  • About Kagit
  • K-Influencers
  • For Brands
  • For Creators

Navigation

  • Home
  • K-Pop
  • K-Beauty
  • K-Drama
  • K-Food
  • K-Travel
  • K-Style
  • K-Biz

Rankings

  • All Rankings
  • K-Pop Buzz Chart
  • K-Beauty Ranking
  • K-Drama Chart
  • K-Food Trends
  • K-Style Chart
  • K-Influencer Index

Community

  • Login
  • Bookmarks
  • Settings

Contact

admin@kagit.kr
ServicesKagitkagit.krwishnotewishnote.krComing soonwishnote.twwishnote.tw→ merging into kagit.kr TC

© 2026 Kagit. All rights reserved.

TermsPrivacy
HomeDiscoverRankingsEventsMe
HomeK-PopFIFTY FIFTY is accused of being ineligible for settlement! Record company blasts: Initially, investment was made to Ha Sung Woon and representative Jeon!
K-Pop

FIFTY FIFTY is accused of being ineligible for settlement! Record company blasts: Initially, investment was made to Ha Sung Woon and representative Jeon!

Caridee小編7/10/20233 views 1 min read

Recently, FIFTY FIFTY filed an exclusive contract false disposition lawsuit against their management company ATTRAKT citing settlement issues. However, Korean media today suggested that the lawsuit they filed was actually meaningless. This is because Interpark, who signed a prepaid contract with StarCrew, stated that the investment contract was not FIFTY FIFTY's investment funds, hence there was no obligation to pay the members.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 

On April 5, following the first public hearing on the suspension of exclusive contract effect, Jeon Hong-jun, representative of ATTRAKT, told reporters that Interpark Entertainment and private company StarCrew have signed a prepayment circulation contract worth 9 billion Korean Won.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 

At that time, the defense argued that 6 billion out of 9 billion Korean Won was used for investing in FIFTY FIFTY records, record earnings were paid by StarCrew and said, "Under normal circumstances, a 9 billion won prepaid circulation contract would be signed between Interpark and ATTRAKT, StarCrew would shoulder the debt and it is also the structure paid to FIFTY FIFTY." However, Korean media pointed out that this is a complete misunderstanding of the investment contract payment process in the entertainment industry.

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
廣告
廣告
Caridee小編

Caridee小編

駐韓小編跟你說說韓國大小事～

comments (0)

0

Related Posts

【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY製作人被爆5年前曾涉同樣爭議！疑似用相同手法搶走孫勝妍！K-Pop

【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY製作人被爆5年前曾涉同樣爭議！疑似用相同手法搶走孫勝妍！

近日，FIFTY FIFTY和ATTRAKT娛樂的專屬合約紛爭成為話題，被指是「幕後勢力」的製作人The Givers代表安聖日過去也曾捲入同樣爭議。在2017年，孫勝妍以所屬公司為對象向法院要求停止專屬合約的效力，但未被接受。法院表示，駁回當時孫勝妍以經紀公司為對象提出的專屬合約效力停止訴訟。 孫勝妍從2012年9月開始與Fortune公司簽訂了專屬合約，Fortune公司於2011年5月與Catchpop娛樂公司簽訂了相互委託所屬歌手管理業務的合同。當時孫勝妍以Fortune公司在沒有與自己達成協議的情況下，將合同當事人轉讓Catchpop，一年製作一張唱片的條件也沒有履行，再加上活動支援不足，妨礙出演音樂劇爲由要求解除合約。 但是裁判部表示：「孫勝妍從去年6月中旬開始就與Catchpop代表協商出演電視節目，當時沒有提出這樣的問題，孫勝妍或者默認兩家公司的合約達成協議。孫勝妍主張與Fortune公司的信任關係破裂不能維持合約，但從事實來看孫勝妍只是單方面主張解除合約而已，並沒有因為違反Fortune公司的義務而達到難以維持合約的程度。」 另外，孫勝妍作為新人以破格的5:5的條件分配了收益，聽取經紀公司的解釋後，確認了這是立場差異中發生的問題，所以駁回了假處分申請。之後經紀公司表示：「考慮到年輕藝人的未來，希望達成協議」，要求與孫勝妍持續進行對話，但遭到了拒絕。 本月5日，據藝人界別相關人士透露：「安代表約在5年前曾介入孫勝妍和經紀公司發生專屬合約效力停止假處分的訴訟時中，當時說要帶孫勝妍去其他經紀公司進行活動，引發了與經紀公司的紛爭。」 「當時孫勝妍的經紀公司只委託安代表編曲一次，孫勝妍甚至對經紀公司發生了法律糾紛。在這麼短的時間裡，孫勝妍也可以和經紀公司發生糾紛，FIFTY FIFTY長時間跟安代表在一起相信更容易被操控。」孫勝妍被駁回訴訟後離開經紀公司，現在安代表旗下的經紀公司繼續活動。 網友看到相關爭議後紛紛表示：「真的雞皮疙瘩！安聖日代表又做了這樣的事」、「真是一模一樣啊！這次事情鬧大了，沒法就這樣輕易帶走」、「FIFTY FIFTY剛開始也說會轉到其他經紀公司，如果大家不再關心的話，會安靜地去到安代表的經紀公司」、「孫勝妍事件很有名，甚至不是直接轉到安聖日的經紀公司，而是為了不讓人看出來，中間還相隔一年時間！ 同樣的事件啊！」、「孫勝妍的經紀公司也因為法庭攻防戰長期處於困境，所以應得的違約金是24億韓元，但是只申請了2億韓元就送走了，之後乾脆就停業了」等。 小編：真的雞皮疙瘩！原來當時也是這樣搶人！😳

Caridee小編3 years ago
FIFTY FIFTY海外粉反應惹韓國網友吐糟！網狠批：比想象中更無知！K-Pop

In an interview with Korean media, Interpark stated: "The reason for the pre-payment contract at that time was based on the success of Kang Sung-hoon under StarCrew and the experience and ability of CEO Jun Quan Hong. Although Interpark knew about StarCrew's idea of launching a girl group, the name FIFTY FIFTY wasn't even decided at that time. It was before The Givers' representative Ahn Seong-il joined."

Image Source_Instagram |gooreumseng
Image Source_Instagram |gooreumseng

The pre-paid music production contract is a common method used by small and medium-sized production companies to raise funds for their artists. This is done by getting an early investment for the production cost after signing contracts with record companies regarding the production and release of music. Most of these small and medium-sized companies frequently accept this kind of pre-payment investment to secure the cash for production costs. The pre-paid amount is used to cover the cost of producing the artist's records and the company's operating expenses. The pre-payment has no relationship with the artist's settlement. If the artist's sales unexpectedly rise and there's still a need to repay the pre-payment, the companies will have to find alternative ways to raise cash to pay the artist's settlement. A related person said, "Out of the 90 billion won investment, it was not for FIFTY FIFTY, but the investment was for other artists like Ha Sung-woon."

Image Source_Instagram |gooreumseng
Image Source_Instagram |gooreumseng

It is extremely rare for small and medium-sized companies to invest billions of Won into groups that have not yet made their debut. It was also revealed by certain insiders that ATTRAKT had already invested over 5 billion Won in FIFTY FIFTY before their debut. A certain insider pointed out, "The CEO thought it would be easier to attract investments if the company had fewer debts after FIFTY FIFTY's success, hence paid out of their own pockets. However, the members pointed out in the lawsuit that it's unreasonable not to receive a settlement due to advance investment."

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 

Interpark also pointed out: "Starting from the release date, both domestic and overseas will provide accounting data to the planning company in a cycle of 3 months and 4 months respectively. For the record and music source income, members have received zero South Korean Won from December of last year until April of this year. Although 'Cupid' released in February this year has attracted attention overseas, it is difficult to get a settlement immediately as it is irrelevant to the advance payment."

Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 
Image Source_Instagram | we_fiftyfifty 

Editor: The FIFTY FIFTY incident is getting more and more exposed! 😳

FIFTY FIFTY海外粉反應惹韓國網友吐糟！網狠批：比想象中更無知！

近日，女團FIFTY FIFTY的4位成員正向現在的經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟，連日來也被爆出不同的證據，讓不少韓國網友也同情ATTRAKT的全代表，希望他可以好好加油。 然而，有韓國網友今日就翻出FIFTY FIFTY海外粉絲的反應，與韓國網友完全持相反的態度也引來網友們的熱議。 根據韓國網友在Twitter上的截圖可見，不少外國網友也在FIFTY FIFTY的官方帳號下留言：「釋放FIFTY FIFTY」、「會永遠等待FIFTY FIFTY！」、「去你的！ATTRAKT！」、「ATTRAKT你在做什麼？你搞砸了整個大計劃！」、「希望女孩們可以勝訴！」 外國網友與韓國網友完全不同的反應，也讓韓國網友感到非常衝擊：「外國人比想象中更無知」、「這種回應真的很討厭！外國粉絲為什麼這樣」、「看他們說不要罵T.O.P、勝利就知道」、 「所以說外國粉是蟑螂也是有理由的」、「刑事起訴結束後公開會計賬簿和資料就能知道誰是對的」、「在YouTube上外國人也都知道說要打起精神來，Twitter簡直無法相信」。 但也有網友指出：「外國粉絲不會捲入感性的爆料，而是客觀的。外國粉認為藝人應該清楚地清算，相反韓國卻有煽動地提到賣車賣錶，即使在清算不透明的情況下，奴隸合約也要忍受，所以這也是在韓國很多經紀公司欺騙藝人的原因。」 也有網友提到：「只是部份在Twitter的外國粉才這樣！也有跟韓國網友一樣的海外粉」，之前有海外網友亦指：「現在這個混亂的情況讓人以為她們出道很長時間、有很多熱門歌，但其實人們只懂一首熱門歌而不是成員，她們要完了。」 小編：海外粉的反應跟韓國網友真的相差很遠！🧐

Caridee小編3 years ago
【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY今推《芭比》新曲！網批：連Cupid都不想聽！K-Pop

【韓娛熱議】FIFTY FIFTY今推《芭比》新曲！網批：連Cupid都不想聽！

近日，女團FIFTY FIFTY的4位成員正向現在的經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟，然而ATTRAKT今天卻為FIFTY FIFTY公開新曲。 今日上午，YouTube《FIFTY FIFTY Official》公開了《FIFTY FIFTY - Barbie Dreams(feat. Kalii)[From Barbie The Album] [Official Audio]》的短片，而該歌曲是為電影《芭比》主唱的OST新曲。 網友們紛紛表示：「經紀公司還一直為她們做下去，這更讓人心痛⋯⋯」、「雖然對經紀公司代表感到很抱歉，但也不太想聽她們的歌」、「連Cupid都不想聽！」、 「本來電影的形象做的很好，但這OST到底是什麼」、「站在代表的立場上，真的感到很可惜」、「維持組合的名字，再重新選成員吧」、 「經紀公司代表太可憐了，如果重組的話我會支持你」、「成員全部換掉吧。現在成員們的歌都不想聽」、「現在能這樣用英語唱也是因為經紀公司的支持，真是的⋯⋯」等。 5日，在首爾中央地方法院開始了FIFTY FIFTY向經紀公司ATTRAKT提出違反專屬合約的訴訟。FIFTY FIFTY的律師表示：「該事件基於經紀公司的能力不足，經紀公司和製作公司的矛盾需要個別解決。」 對此，ATTRAKT的律師表示：「代表用了全部財產，還挪用了母親的資金。80億韓元不是小數目，ATTRAKT投資了這些資金還未指沒有能力是不是有點過分？成員們沒有錯誤。我們也想盡快達成協議，但是沒有接觸的機會，通過代理人也無法得到任何答覆。該事件的本質是藝人背後的勢力。」 小編：經紀公司在這個情況還幫FIFTY FIFTY宣傳新曲⋯⋯😢

Caridee小編3 years ago2

Trending now

  1. 1

    Song Ji-hyo's Casual Hairstyles Spark Debate, Even Her Styling Team Expresses Frustration

    5.6K views
  2. 2

    [K-Culture Scoop] I.O.I's 4 Members Spotted at Nightclub Party, Chaeyeon's Outfit Unexpectedly Steals the Show

    4.5K views
  3. 3

    First-Generation Idols Click-B's Yoo Ho-seok and Oh Jong-hyuk Reveal Daughters, Stunning Netizens with 'God-Tier' Genes

    3.2K views
  4. 4

    Actress Park Si-yeon, 46, Shows Ageless Beauty Amidst Comeback Efforts After DUI, Propofol Scandals

    2.8K views
  5. 5

    Former 'The Return of Superman' Star Lee Jae-si, 18, Stuns Fans With Mature Look, Accepted to New York Fashion School

    1.8K views