FIFTY FIFTY經紀公司申請美英中日4國商標權！力阻成員海外活動！
This article isn't available in English yet, so it's shown in its original language (繁體中文).
FIFTY FIFTY所屬公司ATTRAK正式向美國、英國、中國、日本4個國家申請了商標權，因此即使FIFTY FIFTY專屬合約效力被停止可以獨立活動，今後4名成員在沒有得到ATTRAK同意的情況下，也很難在海外以FIFTY FIFTY的名字進行活動。
ATTRAK於今年7月5日在4個國家同時申請了商標權，已經賦予了申請號碼正在辦理正式登記手續。ATTRAK的專利代理人25日接受《文化日報》採訪時表示：「專利權或商標權必須按照各國獨立的原則，在相關各國獲得個別權利才能在該國行使權利，不能擁有韓國的商標權在美國或英國行使商標權。」
此前，ATTRAK於今年5月15日在韓國申請了FIFTY FIFTY的英文名稱商標後，6月19日提出專屬合同假處分申請的4名成員申請了韓文名等商標的事被曝光。
但是，美國和英國等國家根據《商標法》優先權制度，以ATTRAK在韓國首次申請商標的5月15日為基準，因此今後即使4名成員在海外申請商標權，優先權也在ATTRAK。代理人亦表示：「海外商標權申請程序是我們委託美國律師事務所向美國專利廳受理。」
如果ATTRAK申請的海外商標權正式註冊，那麼4名成員在海外也難以進行活動。在輿論和媒體的壓力下，4名成員堅拒對話、堅持專屬合約效力停止假處分申請，相關人士指：「因為信賴受損，所以很難再一起工作」，因此合約停止後，一般較集中於海外活動。
然而從現在的輿論來看，4名成員很難在韓國活動，因此有預測稱，在美國Billboard排行榜、英國Official排行榜等取得令人刮目相看的他們可能會與外國唱片公司合作，以海外市場為主展開活動。但是如果ATTRAK獲得商標權，她們就不能在海外使用FIFTY FIFTY的商標。
相關人士亦表示：「就像BTS、BLACKPINK這個名字一樣，每個組合的名字都體現了他們的本質。如果出道不到一年的新人不能使用這個名字，那麼活動幅度只能大幅減少，再加上在知識產權概念強烈的海外，在沒有權利的情況下使用商標，可能會捲入巨大的訴訟中。」
小編：全代表要強硬起來了！💪🏻
Caridee小編
駐韓小編跟你說說韓國大小事～
Cheer the stars of this story
- FIFIFTY FIFTY
Cheer Level 0
0Your Cheers
Log in to start collecting cheers on this article:
- Read +5
- Early reader +5 · 20 spots left
- Comment +10
- First comment +20
comments (0)
Related Posts
K-Pop謊話連篇！FIFTY FIFTY製作人遭爆連學歷都是假！網譏：原來偽造是日常！
遭指為FIFTY FIFTY合約爭議幕後黑手的The Givers代表安聖日24日又被爆出學歷造假，讓韓網一陣嘩然。 以24日為基準，在所有入口網站上登載的安聖日資料皆顯示為「中央大學經營學系畢業」，然而根據韓媒實地採訪的結果卻非如此，中央大學經營學系畢業生名單中並無安聖日這個人物的存在。 1975年出生的安聖日，自出生以來就一直都使用安聖日這個名字，然而不管是他的本名還有出生年度以及出生年月日都沒有出現在畢業生名單中。 中央大學方面也表示「中央大學經營系畢業生名單中並沒有出現安聖日這個名字，內部網站上也搜尋不到」 安聖日曾擔任許多公司的代表或是理事等職位，經歷可說是相當華麗，而在獲得這些職位前，安聖日也都在履歷書上的學歷欄位填寫了「中央大學經營學系畢業」。媒體雖然也向安聖日本人詢問是否承認偽造學經歷之事實，然而截至目前為止都尚未得到安聖日的回覆。 網友看了也不禁表示「怎麼挖都挖不完」、「天啊」、「哈哈哈」、「他的人生就是詐欺」、「超好笑」、「真的是個騙子」 「連學歷都偽造嗎…?」、「FIFTY FIFTY要丟臉死了」、「每次爆出新的東西都讓人好驚訝」、「難道他是born to be騙子嗎？」、「如果明天爆出他離開韓國，一點都不奇怪」、「爆不完的料…」、「完全是大禮包耶」 小編：哇…安聖日的料真的是爆不完耶…
![[Hot Topic] Dispatch revisits past lawsuit doubts over Son Seong Yeon, questioning if the 'FIFTY FIFTY' producer is a habitual offender!](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kagit.kr%2F2023%2F07%2F24%2F1_331a192a33.png&w=1920&q=75)
K-Pop[Hot Topic] Dispatch revisits past lawsuit doubts over Son Seong Yeon, questioning if the 'FIFTY FIFTY' producer is a habitual offender!
Recently, the FIFTY FIFTY incident has been making huge noise. Producer Ahn Seong-il is accused of using the same tactic to exploit Son Sung-wan. Korean media Dispatch has even dug out a fake disposition judgement made for Son Sung-wan in 2017. Many netizens also point out that Ahn Seong-il is a habitual offender. In February 2017, the Seoul Central District Court rejected all applications for the case, with the litigation costs borne by Son Seung-yeon. It is known that Son Seung-yeon signed an exclusive contract with Fortune company in 2012, and terminated the contract four years later through email notification. At the time, the reasons Son Seong Yeon demanded for contract termination were, ① The previous agency Fortune failed to produce a new album, ② Son Seong Yeon didn't profit from Fortune, ③ Fortune was not supportive or obstructed her entertainment activities, ④ Fortune did not fulfill its liquidation obligations, ⑤ Fortune refused or hindered her participation in musical supports, and ⑥ Fortune forced Son Seong Yeon to publicly disclose her home environment, etc. The court pointed out that even though the agency did not produce one new album every year, it had produced more than three singles on average annually. Therefore, it is hard to view this as a breach of contract. The other reasons were also considered by the court to be unreasonable and were dismissed, hence the case request was not accepted and was rejected. As of April 2018, two months after Son Seung-yeon terminated her contract with Fortune, she signed an exclusive contract with 24th Street, which is represented by Ahn Seong-il. Ahn Seong-il had arranged Son Seung-yeon's cover of "The First Snow's Falling" in 2014, which was followed by an event where Son Seung-yeon requested to terminate the contract. It led many netizens to associate this with the recent FIFTY FIFTY incident. Korea media also revealed that Son Seung-yeon once posted on Instagram thanking producer An Seong-il, even calling him the "representative oppa". Many netizens responded to the incident by saying, "She actually called the representative oppa..." and "I don't want to see her play anymore, representative oppa...". Other netizens also pointed out, "At first I thought it was Son Seung-yeon's former agency's fault, but behind it was An Seong-il. He really is a gangster terminator," "That poor agency! It even went bankrupt..." "If you want to sign with the person you want, you have to wait until the contract expires. It's wrong to blame a decent agency and then unfairly cancel the contract," "An Seong-il is a repeat offender."
K-Pop華納音樂首度回應FIFTY FIFTY事件！曾提議用「200億買斷」尹專務坦言不考慮合作！
近日圍繞女團FIFTY FIFTY的爭議不斷，負責FIFTY FIFTY海外流通的華納音樂仍回應了相關問題。 當初，全代表對製作人安聖日提出「Label Deal」的提案，在不出售公司的前提下，以預付款投資的方式取得資金，這也可以通過兩人4月22日互發的短信中確認。 之後，全代表在5月8日一起會見了華納音樂代表陳某和尹專務也沒有談論「Label Deal」，但是5月9日給全代表打電話的尹專務則提到了「用200億買斷」。 尹專務18日亦接受韓媒《文化日報》訪問表示：「應該先向全代表進行準確的確認。全代表回答說『不會說那樣的話』並拒絕了交易和買斷。」 據悉，華納音樂對FIFTY FIFTY感興趣，所以在「Label Deal」提案失敗後，提議向ATTRAKT投資預付款。尹專務說：「我們也在談論預付金，正在協調合同，安製作人主張直接行銷困難，並建議『走別的路』。」 對於此次事件，華納音樂保持沉默，也有人懷疑「華納音樂似乎想搶FIFTY FIFTY」，若FIFTY FIFTY提出的假處分申請成功，會不會與華納音樂或The Givers合作。 然而尹專務卻劃清界線說：「還沒有考慮過這一點。現在FIFTY FIFTY也通過華納音樂在海外流通，不是通過The Givers，而是通過ATTRAKT進行」，與安製作人保持距離。有歌謠界人士亦指：「華納音樂如果日後直接與FIFTY FIFTY合作的話，將會受到巨大的指責和難以挽回的道德打擊。」 小編：業界也跟她們劃清界線了⋯⋯🧐
Trending now
- 1
Girls' Generation's Yuri Responds to Haters with Humorous Meme
- 2
Girls' Generation's Kim Hyo-yeon Reveals Why She's Lived in Group Dorm for 19 Years
- 3
Han So-hee Reflects on Love, Self-Worth After Ryu Jun-yeol Split: "He Didn't Abandon Me"
- 4
Actress Park Ha-sun Flaunts Chanel-Clad US Vacation Amidst Controversial Remarks from Go Young-wook
- 5
Baek Jin-hee's Past Relationships Resurface, Sparking 'Love Square' Speculation with Yoon Hyun-min, Park Seo-joon, and Jeon So-min